if any horses look similar i would say it's quarters and appaloosas. i feel like it could just be me but i constantly mistake them for each other. comparing the art side by side, they do have distinct differences in muscle definition and body structure though.

@rook. Yeah it's a bit extreme. To me it's ridiculously overdone and does the opposite for me and makes me cringe.

@forgottenland, ya know that is a very good point. Low key reminds me how I struggle in real life with Shires and Clydes.

You all make very good points! 

For the C and Hispano, I kinda noticed that their legs were similar (with the feathers and all that), their heads were kinda the same, and I feel like the pose for C is just Hispano from a different angle

To Redrookk's point, I think the TWH is pretty accurate with its stance, neck, etc. One of the reasons why I love the TWH is bc it was the first horse I had a trail ride on...I miss those days tbh. But i can understand where KatieLee is coming from. Not all players like the TWH, and that is 100% okay.

I hate the TWH stance. My horse has never naturally stood parked out like that and its so weird. I cant stand it. Haha he has so many pretty and natural gaits that would work so much better. I get wanting to differentiate the breeds but there are already so many that are similar, I think it could be done fairly well. 

hispano arabes don't have feathers though?

I'm aware of that, I just meant that the two had rlly similar legs, hooves, and heads.

i don't really get what the point of bringing up the feathers is then, sorry but i think i'll head out of this conversation as it's just making me confused.

I'm not a huge fan of the mustang art myself, I think it looks unnatural and a bit off. Again, no hate, it is amazing work though a little unrealistic of a pose.